The Jesus Mysteries: Was the "Original Jesus" a Pagan God? (U)

whether You Conclude That This Book Is The Most Alarming Heresy Of The Millennium Or The Mother Of All Revelations, The Jesus Mysteries Deserves To Be Read. Fort Worth Star -telegramwhat If . . .* There Were Absolutely No Evidence For The Existence Of A Historical Jesus?* For Thousands Of Years Pagans Had Also Followed A Son Of God?* This Pagan Savior Was Also Born Of A Virgin On The Twenty-fifth Of December Before Three Shepherds, Turned Water Into Wine At A Wedding, Died And Was Resurrected, And Offered His Body And Blood As A Holy Communion?* These Pagan Myths Had Been Rewritten As The Gospel Of Jesus Christ?* The Earliest Gnostic Christians Knew That The Jesus Story Was A Myth?* Christianity Turned Out To Be A Continuation Of Paganism By Another Name? publishers Weekly this Is At Once A Wonderful And A Terribly Flawed Book; At Times It Is Absolutely On Target, And Yet It Yields To Such Vitriol And Inflated Language That It Will Be Easily Dismissed. The Authors Postulate That Christianity As We Know It, Regardless Of The Teachings Of Its Founder, Ultimately Distilled And Usurped The Greatest Wisdom Inherent In Pagan Traditions. Specifically, They Charge That Christianity Looted The Traditions Of The Osiris/dionysus Cults--borrowing, Synthesizing And Domesticating What Was Most Sacred To Greco-roman Civilization. Freke And Gandy Assert That Christian History Is Nothing Less Than The Greatest Cover-up Of All Time. Christianity's Original Gnostic Doctrines And Its True Origins In The Pagan Mysteries Had Been Ruthlessly Suppressed By The Mass Destruction Of The Evidence And The Creation Of A False History To Suit The Political Purposes Of The Roman Church. The Authors Compare The Revolution Of The Imperial Christian Church (which Finally Suppressed Pagan Worship) To The Communist Revolution In Russia, Arguing That Both Saw Enormous Bloodshed And Suppression Of All Dissent. This Kind Of Polemic Detracts From The Usefulness Of This Study. The Book's Great Tragedy Is That Many Of Its Most Scholarly Kernels Of Insight, Such As The Authors' Discussion Of Secret Mark Or Their Tantalizing Analysis Of The Lazarus Material, Will Be Lost To Responsible Discussion. In Sum, This Is A Disappointing, Sensationalist Polemic. (aug.) Copyright 2000 Cahners Business Information.|